Home/Activities/Agree to Disagree: Switch Sides Edition

Debate · A great activity for everyone

Agree to Disagree: Switch Sides Edition

Everyone picks a side on a debatable statement and argues it — then, partway through, has to switch and build the case for the side they just argued against. It works because defending a position you didn't choose does more for real understanding than agreeing ever could.

What is Agree to Disagree: Switch Sides Edition?

Agree to Disagree: Switch Sides Edition takes the site's base debate format and adds one twist: partway through, everyone switches. The host puts a genuinely debatable statement in front of the room, people position themselves — agree on one side, disagree on the other — and each side makes its opening argument. Then everyone crosses over and builds a fresh case for the position they were just arguing against.

It works because you can't fake the switch. Building an honest argument for a side you didn't pick forces you to actually understand it, which does more for empathy and active listening than any amount of polite nodding — and it tends to surface exactly where your own first take was thinner than you thought.

It's built for a room that's ready to argue in good faith and switch sides without it turning personal. For a group that's still feeling each other out, or a topic that's genuinely live at work right now, start with the base Agree to Disagree instead — same format, no switch required.

The rules

  1. Pick a statement that's genuinely debatable — never a trick question, never off-limits.
  2. Everyone stakes a side based on their first reaction — agree or disagree.
  3. Each side makes its opening argument, uninterrupted.
  4. Partway through: everyone switches, and now argues the side they were just arguing against.
  5. Argue the new side for real — half-hearted doesn't count.
  6. Respect the room: listen actively, and let people finish.

Before you start

  • Group size: 3–20 participants. Works with a small team or a whole department — split bigger groups into parallel debates if the room gets loud.
  • A ready list of debate topics. Prepare your statements ahead of time — light-hearted to serious, and picked to avoid unnecessary divisiveness for this specific group.
  • Built for hybrid. Runs in person as written; on a call, use reaction emojis, chat responses, or breakout rooms to sort people into sides.
  • Optional moderator. One person to run the opening arguments and keep things on track — useful for bigger or newer groups, not required for a small one.

How to run it

  1. Set the scene 3–5 min

    Set up a space where two sides can gather, and have your first debate statement ready. Explain the objective and the ground rules before anyone picks a side.

  2. Present the statement, pick a side 1–2 min

    Introduce one debatable statement. Everyone positions themselves based on their first reaction — agree on one side, disagree on the other.

  3. Opening arguments 5–10 min

    Each side makes its case, uninterrupted. This is where people commit to the position they actually hold.

  4. Switch sides 5–10 min

    Everyone crosses over and builds a fresh argument for the position they were just arguing against.

  5. Reflect, then repeat 10–20 min

    Ask what it felt like to argue the other side. Run it again with a new statement for as long as the room has appetite, then debrief on empathy and open-mindedness before you close.

← the switch is the whole game.

Facilitator tips

Pick topics with careChoose statements that are genuinely debatable, not ones that lean on stereotypes or single out one group in the room.
Draw out the quiet onesInvite the hesitant to weigh in directly. A safe, welcoming room gets more voices in than a loud one does.
Keep the language neutralSkip gendered pronouns and assumptions when you write the statements — it keeps the debate about the idea, not the person.
Plan for accessibilityCheck that the physical space works for everyone in the room, and have a backup way to participate for anyone hitting tech trouble on a call.

Variations

Role-play

Argue from an assigned character or persona instead of your own opinion — good for a group that finds personal debate too exposing.

Expert round

Argue as if you're the room's leading authority on the topic — confidence required, credentials optional.

Context-specific scenarios

Swap generic statements for ones pulled from your team's actual work or industry.

Why it works

Empathy, on commandArguing the side you didn't pick forces you to build a case for a view you didn't choose — a faster route to real understanding than agreeing ever is.
Everyone actually listensYou can't argue the other side well unless you tracked what they said the first time. The switch turns listening from polite into necessary.
Blind spots surfaceConstructing the counter-argument shows you exactly where your own reasoning was thin — the game reveals it before a real disagreement would.
HELLO, MY NAME ISJon

"This is the one I reach for when a team needs to actually understand each other, not just take turns talking. Building the case for the side you didn't pick does more for real listening than any ground rule ever could, and it runs just as well over a video call as it does in a boardroom."

Jon Zajac · Founder & Chief Icebreaker

Reflection questions

For teams and classrooms that want the debrief — these turn the switch into a conversation about how fast opinions actually move.

  1. What was your initial reaction when you heard the first statement?Instinctive reactions reveal how fast opinions form — before anyone's made a real argument yet.
  2. How did it feel to argue for a position you initially disagreed with?Gets at flexibility directly, and the discomfort here is the useful part.
  3. Did your opinion change on any of the topics discussed during the activity? If so, which one and why?Tracks real shifts in view, not performed ones — the "why" is where the insight lives.
  4. Can you think of real-life situations where this activity's insights might be helpful or applicable?Moves the exercise from game to habit, out into situations that actually matter.
  5. How can you apply the lessons learned from this activity to promote more productive disagreements and discussions in your personal and professional relationships?The graduation question — turns a debate exercise into a communication habit.

Jon Zajac

Founder & Chief Icebreaker

I started IcebreakerSpot because I believe strong connections are the foundation of successful teams. This site exists to make it easy to find and share the icebreakers and team-building activities that build trust, spark collaboration, and help groups do great things together.